A short stub on the case of the short stub case

June 28, 2011 — 1 Comment

Last week CJ Chivers introduced us to the “short stub case.” His argument was that to be used in a breech-loaded mortar system (such as the AMOS or NEMO) a ‘short stub case’ is needed. Since no short stub cases were found in Misrata a breech-loaded system couldn’t have fired the shells.

The trouble with this argument is explained in a recent patent application by BAE Systems:

When stub case weapon systems are fired, the stub case separates from the round. Thereafter, the stub case must be removed from the breech. Because of the relatively high temperatures generated during the firing process, there are also issues relating to disposal of the hot stub case in a safe manner.

So the stub case is ejected in a burst of hot air and doesn’t travel to its target…

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. The New York Times: All the Propaganda that’s Fit to Print « Human rights investigations - July 20, 2011

    […] The issue of the short stub case, which was pretty central to the NYT article’s allegations against HRI is tackled here. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s